Skip to content
All instruments

Equity Research Lab · Instrument 03 of 07

Factor exposure

A regression of daily excess returns on the market and the standard style factors, with the errors a short history deserves, to separate what the stock did from what the market did to it.

Before a stock's return can be called a judgment on the company, the part that any stock of its kind would have earned has to be removed. The factor regression does that removal. It explains daily excess returns with the market premium and five standard style factors, and what is left over is the part specific to the company.

What it measures

Daily returns in excess of the risk-free rate are regressed on the Fama–French five factors (market, size, value, profitability, investment) plus momentum. The coefficients are the stock's exposures; the intercept, annualized, is the return not explained by them; the R-squared is the share of variance the factors explain, and one minus it is the idiosyncratic share. Standard errors are Newey–West, so autocorrelation and changing volatility do not flatter the confidence intervals. Rolling windows show whether the exposures have been stable, a chronological split shows whether the fit survives out of sample, and the seven tests in each dossier are corrected for multiple comparisons.

Assumptions

The factor files come from the Kenneth R. French Data Library and end one to two months before the price file; the regression uses the overlap and publishes both end dates. Returns are split-adjusted price returns unless a dividend table is pinned. Linearity and constant exposures within a window are assumed, which is exactly what the rolling and out-of-sample checks are there to test.

When it misleads

A newly listed company has a short sample, and a short sample produces wide intervals; the artifact flags it and the memo does not read a precise beta into it. An intercept that looks large is rarely significant once the sample and the multiple-testing correction are respected, and the lab publishes the corrected value rather than the raw one. Factor exposures also describe the past sample, not a law; a company that changes its business changes its loadings.

How the lab uses it

The factor section tells the reader how much of the stock's story is the AI trade at large and how much is this company, and it sizes the idiosyncratic risk the thesis is actually taking. The demo below fits the same estimator to a synthetic series whose true exposures are known, so the reader can see what a recovered coefficient and its interval look like when the answer is certain.

Recover known exposures from synthetic returns

Illustrative inputs — not a company's figures

Set the true betas, the noise, and its autocorrelation, then shorten the sample and watch the intervals widen. The data are seeded, so the same inputs always give the same fit.

Recovered exposures with 95% intervals: Dots are the estimates; whiskers are Newey–West intervals over five lags.
Recovered exposures with 95% intervals. Dots are the estimates; whiskers are Newey–West intervals over five lags.
Read the figure as a table
Recovered exposures with 95% intervals, coefficients
FactorBetaLowHigh
Market1.211.071.35
Size0.290.090.49
Value-0.43-0.66-0.20
Estimates against the truth.
FactorTrue betaEstimateHAC s.e.tOLS s.e.
Market1.201.210.07117.150.069
Size0.300.290.1002.900.111
Value−0.40−0.430.117−3.630.113
  • Alpha, annualized−6.4%± 41.2% at 95%
  • R-squared39%
  • Observations500

On 500 synthetic days the estimator recovers a market beta of 1.21 against a true 1.20, with a Newey–West interval of 1.07 to 1.35 and an R-squared of 39%.